- Nov 25, 2016
- 1,801
- 0
- 0
How is it puzzling? It couldn't be simpler. It's a feature that you don't care about. I don't care about it either for what that's worth.
But for some, it's a feature that will really make a difference in how they use their device. So why don't you "get that" like the headphone jack, design or Samsung Pay?
Sure, I'll try to add some more clarity. When I read "no wireless charging" as a detractor, I think loss of benefit. So my OP was around trying to figure what that loss of benefit could be since whether wired or wireless the phone itself ends up in the same condition, charged. So since both methods do that, I read that as a zero sum item.
Unless a person has multiple tech items that can be charged wirelessly, I don't see a pickup in wire/cord reduction as it would still be one cord coming from the wall to power one device. So if the phone is the only device that can be charged wirelessly again that, to me that's a zero sum item. Plus the phone is stationary in both situations.
I guess another way to look at it is understanding what's the advantage to having that feature vs. wired. Now having read some of these posts, I can see the main advantage for some users is convenience for them.