Right, and I am not saying it's not great (I haven't used it, so I don't know, but I'd assume it's solid) I'm just so weirded out by things like this, when the browser already exists yet a ton of resources are expended on making another one. The opportunity cost alone seems to outweigh the return (both my opinion of the expected value of each, not actual numbers) which would make any time actually invested be contributing 100% to a negative return on investment. There may be great reasons for doing it too, such as if Chrome doesn't fit with their general UI aesthetics, but my opinion is that things like that should take a back seat to actually pressing matters.
Edit: Corrected auto-corrected typo.