Will I get the update any sooner by constantly clicking 'System update-, or am I just making myself feel better?
Samuri,
I used the XDA developers forum instead of HoB to get to .232. If I use HoB to go to .246, it will still play nice even though I used the .232 build that they provided, correct?
 LMAO
 LMAO  Yea, you're fine.  The HoB doesn't care what you have installed as long as it's 905+.
  Yea, you're fine.  The HoB doesn't care what you have installed as long as it's 905+.Yes, I tried to force the download a few times this morning, to no avail :-[ ...
BUT somewhere out in the ether, somebody got the word that I wanted it. .246 started downloading on its own a few minutes ago!

 Even though I didn't use HoB, you've taught me a lot from your guide, FAQ, and all your posts here on AC. I just want to say THANK YOU! for all your hard work.
 Even though I didn't use HoB, you've taught me a lot from your guide, FAQ, and all your posts here on AC. I just want to say THANK YOU! for all your hard work.I know safestrap screws around with the preinstall folder and causes issues with updating.....even if you uninstalled safestrap
will HoB have a similar issue?
I'm confused. As far as any of us knew a week ago, the big difference between .246 and .247 was the patch to facilitate a later installation of JB, so those two packages would have to have hashed to different values. Now the consensus seems to be that .246 does in fact have that patch, but its hash is the same as what was available via HoB before the OTA was released? Just trying to figure out how the "patchless" .246 hashes to the same value as the OTA ...If anyone getting it pushed happens to be rooted and can copy off the update before they install it I'd like the md5 has from it.
.
.
.
I've confirmed that the leak I use for the HoB is the same as what's being pushed out now. We're good and back on the ota path.

I'm confused. As far as any of us knew a week ago, the big difference between .246 and .247 was the patch to facilitate a later installation of JB, so those two packages would have to have hashed to different values. Now the consensus seems to be that .246 does in fact have that patch, but its hash is the same as what was available via HoB before the OTA was released? Just trying to figure out how the "patchless" .246 hashes to the same value as the OTA ...
I don't like to leave anything to chance.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2
 I'm the same way, it's all about the details.
  I'm the same way, it's all about the details.
