Well I was worried about the Wi-Fi signal as I ordered my Prime the first day I could pre-order it so I was worried if mine was going to have issues being first out of the gate. Although I do get what @SiGGy is saying I don't agree 100%. Connectivity is only a problem if you can't connect and I have never had an issue connecting to a wi-fi signal and doing what I need to do. My access point is in my basement in a 3 floor home and I sit in bed with my Prime and can always connect. Is it 4 bars strong? No! but does it download a 25mb file in less than 30 seconds? Yes! Can I surf the Internet without any problems? Yes! I also own the TF101 and get the same experience with both.
So anyone who is considering not buying the Prime because of so called wi-fi issues is missing out.
Why do you keep saying "so called"?
When they designed the prime with a solid piece of aluminum and no opening for the radio waves to get in through one side of the screen they hampered it's performance. To relate this to something most people understand it's like plugging one of your ears up and only being able to hear through one side of your head. Sure you can still hear, but not nearly as well.
So there is no "so called" here. They hampered the receive/transmit abilities of the device with this design. It's no coincidence they showed a newer designed unit with the wifi antenna's integration done better not even 2 weeks after these started shipping.
Just because your perception is you don't have an issue doesn't mean there isn't one. It just means you don't perceive one for your circumstance. And that's fine.
As an example: You said you can xfer 25MB in 30 seconds. That's not terrible, it's like 6.5Mbit a second. I would bet if you cut a 2.5"x 2.5" hole in center of the back side of your screen where the square antenna is you would see a significant performance increase.
I could only sustain about 1-3Mbit unless I aimed the screen side of unit back at the base station which then I could get 5mbit (or a tiny bit better, close to what you were seeing). However my 2 notebooks were doing 20+mbit at the same location (closer to 35mbit to be exact).
It's all perception like I said... and very circumstantial to ones environment. Your homes building materials, RF reflections, base station placement and do you happen sit with the screen facing the base station? Things like this will all be different from one person to the next. And can greatly effect ones experience.
I expect a *premium* device like this to perform like one. On everything else but WiFi it does. Like I said I'll wait a few months and get the next one.
I'm pretty sick of making excuses for premium products that are released prematurely. Don't release it if it's not ready... "good enough" is not what you pay a premium for. This isn't some oversight. They obviously already knew about this issue and had it fixed in another hardware design but someone decided not to apply the proper changes to this HW release. Probably for cost reasons but I bet mostly to gain xmas sales. It's actually rather disturbing that the company announces the fixed version of their premium product 2 weeks after they start shipping the one with the design flaw.
IMO what they should be doing is recalling all of them and replacing the antenna and screen backing. Hopefully the revised version maybe even has RX diversity.
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I'll go back into hiding now...