- Apr 12, 2012
- 1,515
- 0
- 0
Mods please feel free to merge into another thread if that is your preference.
Review: Moto X is the phone Android needs right now [Updated] | Reviews | Geek.com
This review had an interesting update:
Update 8/22/13: We?ve edited this review to reflect significant changes found in the Moto Maker version of the Moto X. It is our belief that our initial review was based on pre-production hardware, and while we are currently waiting for a response from Motorola regarding the differences in the two Moto X phones we?ve tested, we wanted to update our thoughts on this device. The changes primarily took form in an improved display and camera as well as slightly improved hardware on the second Moto X we received (the Moto Maker version)
If this is true, that could be very encouraging. Or perhaps just a strange variation between two supposedly identical phones.
Some other things in this review:
*best camera quality is with HDR off
* with HDR auto it takes longer to focus
*sometimes best photos are taken from taking a photo while video is recording (I've seen that comment elsewhere)
Is it possible that the early review units had some issues that were corrected by software or firmware. I don't know.
Anyway, I found this to be interesting if nothing else.
Review: Moto X is the phone Android needs right now [Updated] | Reviews | Geek.com
This review had an interesting update:
Update 8/22/13: We?ve edited this review to reflect significant changes found in the Moto Maker version of the Moto X. It is our belief that our initial review was based on pre-production hardware, and while we are currently waiting for a response from Motorola regarding the differences in the two Moto X phones we?ve tested, we wanted to update our thoughts on this device. The changes primarily took form in an improved display and camera as well as slightly improved hardware on the second Moto X we received (the Moto Maker version)
If this is true, that could be very encouraging. Or perhaps just a strange variation between two supposedly identical phones.
Some other things in this review:
*best camera quality is with HDR off
* with HDR auto it takes longer to focus
*sometimes best photos are taken from taking a photo while video is recording (I've seen that comment elsewhere)
Is it possible that the early review units had some issues that were corrected by software or firmware. I don't know.
Anyway, I found this to be interesting if nothing else.