Not only allowing, but staunchly defending the policy. And crazy as I agree it is, Im still willing to pay (eventually) strictly for the convenience it provides.
One word out of there sums it up. What most people fail to realize (not speaking to you weave majjik, but to the person you replied to) is that what you are paying for is services to be provided to your mobile device for the sake of convenience.
Do you really need to watch Netflix on your phone? Absolutely not, but it is definitely something to which I have become accustomed.
For the sake of pure survival, do you really need 4G internet streamed to your laptop every where you go? No, but I can say that for me it is an almost necessary convenience for my work.
The point is that paying for MHS is not paying to share data, as one fee allows for sharing to 8-10 devices (Thunderbolt/Revolution vs. Charge respectively). Comparing it to cable companies charging per computer would mean you pay $30 a month per EACH DEVICE you tether to your phone.
You are paying a subsidized fee for mobile internet, which otherwise would run you upwards of $50 plus the cost of a USB modem/dedicated hotspot on Verizon, PLUS you are getting unlimited what would normally be capped. What do you really have to complain about?
Nothing in life is without its own cost, monetary or otherwise, especially luxury. So what you are really saying that you should be provided high luxury for free?