irvine752
Well-known member
- Mar 2, 2016
- 289
- 0
- 0
You can disagree as well as anyone with an opinion.
The the article you source doesn't do a comparison of B&O vs. USA models.
Of course they have different sound signatures... So does using different music players. Same DAC different software. The B&O software sets up the amp gain differently. Any difference you hear is subjective as to whether or not there is an improvement.
There are no physical hardware adjustments that I am aware of. If they exist, show me.
It's not the actual DAC chipset that's different between the two models, but the circuit design for the chipset that supplements the DAC. Android Authority briefly mentioned it here: http://www.androidauthority.com/lg-v20-audio-capabilities-714807/
A different circuit design certainly counts as a physical hardware difference from an engineering stand point. The non-tuned versions are bright & flat at times whereas the B&O Tuning creates a warm natural & balanced sound that's comparable to an Astell Kern 240 (a 2,000 dollar value), and no that's not subjective, it's really a big deal.
Hardware tuning be it through software or extra cicuitry is how most companies get a competitive edge over the rest. Why would a company such as Astell & Kern charge a customer such high price for the AK240 when the competition like Onkyo can charge less than half the price with almost the same hardware pieces? It all comes down to expert tuning, putting their proprietary stamp on a product, and making it sound better. They also know that those with the deep pockets will always come looking for the best, and the best is what they provide through... tuning.