I've been researching here, at XDA and the greater interwebs for a good answer to the following question/concern (posted by wackydavo a month ago in the droid x forums) but can't seem to find one I understand.
"... It sounds like the real downside is limiting custom roms available. Because of this, I am somewhat concerned that Motorola will stop pushing Android upgrades to the phone after 1+ years and my choice of roms may be limited.
Another concern is performance enhancements. I suspect that the new motoblur is not as efficient as it could be (especially on the Atrix's dual core). I have read that certain roms (including CM) provide speed enhancements through the kernal, which is unaccessible in a signed/encrypted bootloader. I'm not talking about overclocking, which sounds like it is do-able even without access to the kernal. Anyone have any knowledge as to what types of speed/efficiency improvements might be found in a rom that enhances speed within the kernal? ..."
I am concerned that a native kernal that natively supports/utilizes dual-core (both in the OS and applications) may not be released by Motorola for a long time (if ever) following its release. I understand that we will be able to run custom ROMs on top Blur/Froyo, but from my understanding those ROMs won't be able to take advantage of dual-core and will be much less efficient (since a skin is running on top of blur instead of by itself).
If it's (1) unlikely that the dual-core feature will be able to be fully exploited and (2) Motoblur (even though it's a new "better" version) must serve as the base for any ROM, I don't know how much better (i.e. faster) this device might be than a custom-ROM'd Thunderbolt.
I am very much a novice in this stuff, so please help me to understand these potential limitations. Thanks in advance guys!
"... It sounds like the real downside is limiting custom roms available. Because of this, I am somewhat concerned that Motorola will stop pushing Android upgrades to the phone after 1+ years and my choice of roms may be limited.
Another concern is performance enhancements. I suspect that the new motoblur is not as efficient as it could be (especially on the Atrix's dual core). I have read that certain roms (including CM) provide speed enhancements through the kernal, which is unaccessible in a signed/encrypted bootloader. I'm not talking about overclocking, which sounds like it is do-able even without access to the kernal. Anyone have any knowledge as to what types of speed/efficiency improvements might be found in a rom that enhances speed within the kernal? ..."
I am concerned that a native kernal that natively supports/utilizes dual-core (both in the OS and applications) may not be released by Motorola for a long time (if ever) following its release. I understand that we will be able to run custom ROMs on top Blur/Froyo, but from my understanding those ROMs won't be able to take advantage of dual-core and will be much less efficient (since a skin is running on top of blur instead of by itself).
If it's (1) unlikely that the dual-core feature will be able to be fully exploited and (2) Motoblur (even though it's a new "better" version) must serve as the base for any ROM, I don't know how much better (i.e. faster) this device might be than a custom-ROM'd Thunderbolt.
I am very much a novice in this stuff, so please help me to understand these potential limitations. Thanks in advance guys!