Sad day, comrades. I've decided to return my Panda XL after around 4 days of use. Simple reason - I didn't see enough of an upgrade over my Galaxy S8+. For those of you that have used an S8+, I'm sure you know what I mean as it's probably the most direct competitor to the Pixel XL in terms of size and specs.
To break it down, here are my main reasons:
1) Lack of headphone jack. I didn't realize how much this would bother me. It's true I have a decent bluetooth headset, but I also have normal ear buds all over the place, so that no matter where I'm at I can simply plug in. Samsung wisely chose to stick with the jack.
2) The screen. I don't want to beat a dead horse, but it's obvious the S8+ screen is the best on the market and puts the LG screen on the XL to shame.
3) SD card - I have a 256GB Samsung SD card from a promo last year on the S7 Edge. Not a big deal, but it bothers me that I can't use it on the 2-XL.
4) Wireless charging. I have a charging pad beside my bedside, so the gathering dust on it kept reminding me about the 2-XL's lack of the feature.
5) The so-called Samsung lag? I've had the S8+ for around 5 months, have around 100 apps installed, always have at least a dozen apps running simultaneous, and I've seen not a hint of lag. Now let's be clear - the Panda is silky smooth and speedy as a pure-Google handset should be. But in comparing the 2 phones side by side, the Samsung was just as smooth thus negating any advantage in my mind.
6) Battery Life - my typical use drained the battery in both to identical levels by the end of the day. If you don't know, both have pretty much the same 3500mah size battery.
6) Finally - the decision between bare-bone Android versus a feature-rich Samsung skin. As stated in #5 , speed and smooth operation was a toss up to me. Therefore when you weigh the choice of bare-bone versus having a ton of options, I've decided I prefer having the features available - to turn on and off as I please. If I sacrifice slower updates for it, I'll just have to accept it. Android updates, even the major ones (i.e. Nougat to Oreo) have such a minor impact to daily use that I'm really not sure that getting monthly security updates versus every 2-3 months is worth it.
So that's my take.... I'm not trying to bash the 2-XL as it's a fine phone for what it is. But I agree with many here that don't think it's worth the $900 due to what is lacking in the hardware, and Google really shouldn't be charging that amount for just the pure 'software experience'. I'll miss the aesthetics though, I think the Panda is the best looking phone of 2017.
To break it down, here are my main reasons:
1) Lack of headphone jack. I didn't realize how much this would bother me. It's true I have a decent bluetooth headset, but I also have normal ear buds all over the place, so that no matter where I'm at I can simply plug in. Samsung wisely chose to stick with the jack.
2) The screen. I don't want to beat a dead horse, but it's obvious the S8+ screen is the best on the market and puts the LG screen on the XL to shame.
3) SD card - I have a 256GB Samsung SD card from a promo last year on the S7 Edge. Not a big deal, but it bothers me that I can't use it on the 2-XL.
4) Wireless charging. I have a charging pad beside my bedside, so the gathering dust on it kept reminding me about the 2-XL's lack of the feature.
5) The so-called Samsung lag? I've had the S8+ for around 5 months, have around 100 apps installed, always have at least a dozen apps running simultaneous, and I've seen not a hint of lag. Now let's be clear - the Panda is silky smooth and speedy as a pure-Google handset should be. But in comparing the 2 phones side by side, the Samsung was just as smooth thus negating any advantage in my mind.
6) Battery Life - my typical use drained the battery in both to identical levels by the end of the day. If you don't know, both have pretty much the same 3500mah size battery.
6) Finally - the decision between bare-bone Android versus a feature-rich Samsung skin. As stated in #5 , speed and smooth operation was a toss up to me. Therefore when you weigh the choice of bare-bone versus having a ton of options, I've decided I prefer having the features available - to turn on and off as I please. If I sacrifice slower updates for it, I'll just have to accept it. Android updates, even the major ones (i.e. Nougat to Oreo) have such a minor impact to daily use that I'm really not sure that getting monthly security updates versus every 2-3 months is worth it.
So that's my take.... I'm not trying to bash the 2-XL as it's a fine phone for what it is. But I agree with many here that don't think it's worth the $900 due to what is lacking in the hardware, and Google really shouldn't be charging that amount for just the pure 'software experience'. I'll miss the aesthetics though, I think the Panda is the best looking phone of 2017.
Last edited: