Owners manual quoted in the article is enough for me. The date is not wrong, you are.
I'll let the attorney explain why/how the copyright date can be different than the date the article is posted.
FYI the date is automatically posted by the blogging software, not the person writing the article.
Sent from my One X using Android Central Forums
The site you
referenced is the newspaper's English language site. look at the the date on the bottom. No mention of copyright. Game set match. Now if we are done playing silly games about the date how about the Samsung cites admitting responsibility for the burn in? You say the owners manual is good enough for you. What owners manual. You haven't linked anything to a Samsung manual that proves your point. And whether you accept a third party reference to a manual or not is moot. You are trying to convince me, not yourself (otherwise why the multiple post regarding the subject)? Convincing yourself of something you already believe is circular reasoning. You can not provide a Samsung cite for what you claim, period.
Let's cut to the chase.
You own a HTC One X. You are defending it despite numerous examples of its greater number of problems than the S III.
You claim comparing a phone side by side is enough to make a purchase and you diminish the importance of consulting a device forum before making the purchase.
You cite S III forum problems that are by and large user or app issues and claim that that represents a problem phone.
You claim a screen burn in issue with the S III when there are virtually no reports of the issue in the forum. Certainly nothing on the scale of the HTC One's multitasking, battery drain, WIFI issues, etc, etc.
http://forums.androidcentral.com/htc-one-x/167292-official-htc-one-x-bugs-thread.html
For some reason you seem to think it is wrong for me to express my opinion that I'm glad I didn't buy the One X and you don't think I was helping anyone by telling them to read the HTC One X forum before buying that phone.
Your buddy disappeared from this thread after being called out on his false claim that haptic settings not sticking was a wide spread problem with the S III. Now you can't produce proof that Samsung has agreed that they are responsible for screen burn in (those who really want the facts will not accept third party information as coming form Samsung). As alluded to by other posters, your adamant defense of the HTC One X certainly rules out any semblance of impartiality as a moderator in a Samsung Galaxy S3 forum.