JeffDenver
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 2,998
- 27
- 0
LOL, whatever you gotta tell yourself.They like that you are amusing and are thanking you for making them feel really smart.
LOL, whatever you gotta tell yourself.They like that you are amusing and are thanking you for making them feel really smart.
The Chromebook is indeed a cloud focused device, but it is meant to be your first cloud laptop and transitional. You need an SD card to get all your old stuff into the cloud to begin with. LOL
It also serves as a bootable source when needed.
SD cards are inexpensive.
The cloud uses data - costs more for bigger data plan.
Even some of the cheapest phones have SD slots, so it can't cost the manufacturer much at all.
I just don't see why anyone would argue against having hardwired expandable storage.
YEah, in some regard the N4 could be considered a developer's platform too and a bootcamp device for the new cloud, but I think it's marketed appeal is much more than that.
From what I have read, the Chromebook (and it's price point being so high) is not really targeted as a consumer device. It has been rolled out as a development platform or something for only the most geeky of Chrome/Google fans to dive into. But laptops have a totally different purpose than a phone and the vision here is most likely a "home base" for all your google appliances. But, to be sure, this is purely a developer's machine to dive into the world of Chrome.
Here is a good article: The Chromebook Pixel project - Android Authority
It actually goes far beyond just drivers. It will be interesting to see how many features they can or choose to retain without the Sense and Touchwiz frameworks. If it were as simple as drivers, the mods would be able to port the camera software, Beats, and software for other features over to the N4 easily. Unfortunately, these are integrated with the framework, so it will be interesting to say the least.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
I think the answer to all our problems is a Bluetooth or wi/fi external portable(battery powered) HD. Paying to stream data is crazy expensive, & not available too often.
I don't know about the developer phone angle... I think that was more likely with the previous Galaxy Nexus. Also, I think as a developer, you are more inclined to just use PC via USB for software loading? Not sure. But I would say the entire current Nexus line is aimed at getting you into the google world as a whole, which is to say, a cloud world.Thanks for the article on the Chromebook Pixel! That was a good read!
So, if I understand your reasoning correctly, if there were a cheaper Chromebook available, that would appeal more to consumers. Likewise, if there were a more expensive Nexus 4, that may appeal to developers because such a model would presumably have more developer-friendly features, like a micro SD card slot. Do I have that correct, or am I missing something?
I don't know about the developer phone angle... I think that was more likely with the previous Galaxy Nexus. Also, I think as a developer, you are more inclined to just use PC via USB for software loading? Not sure. But I would say the entire current Nexus line is aimed at getting you into the google world as a whole, which is to say, a cloud world.
BTW, there are several cheaper Chromebooks available, but they are not an official Google product. These cheap ones are really just meant to be Google centric netbooks, whereas, the Pixel is aimed to be a developer product to bring Chromium to the next level beyond a linux based netbook. In theory, it should be able to run all the monster serverside apps via the cloud that Google is envisioning... as mentioned in that article, "the Ferrari of Chromebooks" able to power its way into new cloud territory yet to be developed.
I don't know about the developer phone angle... I think that was more likely with the previous Galaxy Nexus. Also, I think as a developer, you are more inclined to just use PC via USB for software loading? Not sure. But I would say the entire current Nexus line is aimed at getting you into the google world as a whole, which is to say, a cloud world.
BTW, there are several cheaper Chromebooks available, but they are not an official Google product. These cheap ones are really just meant to be Google centric netbooks, whereas, the Pixel is aimed to be a developer product to bring Chromium to the next level beyond a linux based netbook. In theory, it should be able to run all the monster serverside apps via the cloud that Google is envisioning... as mentioned in that article, "the Ferrari of Chromebooks" able to power its way into new cloud territory yet to be developed.
I might be wrong, but for a phone, simply going direct via your USB interface is preferable for developers - not doing the data shuffle. I do not think SD boots are a sought after option when you are talking software development or even ROM development, since there are existing methods to root, load a ROM, etc - a hardware interface thing. For a laptop, it is different.
I'm not familiar with everything sold in the play store, but I would assume the Google name (just as with the Nexus and no mention of LG) would determine "official" flagship product or not. NOt sure what the marketing theory is with having all the chromebook options there other than they all include free google drive cloud storage space.
from personal preference, I can tell you those USB ports are prime real estate for my mouse and regular sized keyboard when working extensively (as a developer would) on a laptop.
AS far as booting from SD on a phone... can you do that with any phone? Isn't that a bios ROM thing only with PCs? Phone ROMs are a whole different monster? I'm not familiar.