There is some truth to this but everyone forgets that Apple completely ripped off Palm to develop the iPhone. It's a good thing for Apple that Palm never had enough money to defend their intellectual property.
Thank God other companies don't behave like Apple or there would only be one brand of everything!
**clears throat** I sure as hell didn't forget. My first "touch" anything was Palm. Back in '03 I was rocking a Samsung SPH-i500 and going forward the Treo 600 > 650 > 700p > 755p. Don't get me started on the Tungsten line...E, E|2 & T|5.
Yea...I'm that old!and appalled Apple considers themselves to be so innovative. Somewhere along the line they forgot their humble beginnings.
...and what did you think back in 07 when they introduced the iphone? that apple copied palm?
i think folks should watch the original iphone keynote and think back to the 'smart' phones they were using at that time to compare. steve even states they patented the hell out of it.
lets also switch it around.... had android been first to market what would ppl think if apple then released the iphone and copied gesture based controls, app store, etc etc? would it then be OK for google to defend their 'innovations' via patent infringement claims, temp restraining orders, etc?
...and what did you think back in 07 when they introduced the iphone? that apple copied palm?
i think folks should watch the original iphone keynote and think back to the 'smart' phones they were using at that time to compare. steve even states they patented the hell out of it.
lets also switch it around.... had android been first to market what would ppl think if apple then released the iphone and copied gesture based controls, app store, etc etc? would it then be OK for google to defend their 'innovations' via patent infringement claims, temp restraining orders, etc?
FOSS Patents: Apple and Samsung agree on Tuesday and Thursday deadlines in Galaxy S III dispute
looks like there could be a delay :-\
So many people here are hoping a man 'rots in hell' just because the company he ran, before dying a nasty death, MIGHT temporarily block the sale of a new cellphone? Thats an acceptable thing to say, but calling someone an idiot is absolutely off limits?
Annnyway, wasn't trying to debate patent laws, or their morality. Fact is, the laws are there, and every company in business will use them to protect their intellectual property AND profits. Just out of curiosity, how many times has Apple won/lost patent cases?
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Be careful with the BB Silver Membership assumption.
I was told that Silver gets us the right to "return" for 30 days not 45 on cell phones but after 14 days you loose any chance of getting your upgrade reversed by Sprint so you can't actually swap out to another phone.
Fortunately my EVO LTE's final death was on day 14 and I returned it and they reset my upgrade...otherwise, my assumption was exactly as what was stated a few posts back in this thread.
Thanks for the info. The BB mobile mgr told me I have 14 days from activating to return for refund and reset upgrade. As silver member, I get 45 instead of 30 days to swap only for another phone. I will double check w him when I go to pick up my preordered GS3.
Ian B
You are both right. If you want to do a straight return and re-set your upgrade you only have 14 days, but if you are wanting to do an exchange you have 45 as a silver member. As I understand it you can keep exchanging untill you are happy.
Not sent from my Pre-Ordered Galaxy S3 as it is currently busy being taken to court by Apple, whose motto must now be "Don't innovate, just litigate"!