If I lived in a 4g market it may make sense, but I don't. It makes more sense to pay more each month and receive all the services I am paying for, than to pay less each month and include services I cannot access like 4g. Lets not forget that AT&T 3g allows for simultaneous voice and data while you can only do that on Sprint's meager 4g network. Driving 4 hours for that benefit just doesn't make sense to me.
If you don't text, id get your reasoning. Dropping text would keep your bill to 69 on ATT. But otherwise, I'd call you an idiot for essentially paying an extra 10/month just to spite Sprint over an extra charge, not even quality of service. Can you just stop trolling? The majority of us is going to pay that charge regardless of your crusade to inform us you think the fee is ridiculous, which we have heard multiple times over. Thanks.
I fully understand that you and many others here are unhappy with this fee, but lack the principles to stand up to it. Atleast with the extra $10 a month with AT&T I get simultaneous voice and data, 40k+ more apps(50-60k more apps if you go by Sprint's advertising), and the smooth reliability of an apple product. I have a lot of respect for google and its android phone O/S, but Sprint thinks I will pay extra money each month to use it. Sprint has it wrong, and to anyone else out there who feels like I do I want them to know they are not alone. Sprint could do so much better if they would just charge for the services people actually use instead of charging for services the majority of its subscribers cannot access.
