- Dec 5, 2011
- 455
- 3
- 0
I'm pretty sure is that the original agreement, when signing up for the feedback network, contains a confidentiality clause that would apply in this case as well. So right then and there, spreading the word would be in violation of that agreement.
I'm alsp pretty sure that people like the owner of this blog are being used to unofficially spread the word. Otherwise the authors of the email would have to be complete idiots to not assume that a news hound, who only lives to spread the latest scoop, would actually feel morally obligated to keep anything confidential.
Being from a different generation, it is discouraging to read how many agree that someone else's bad behaviour is justification for one's own poor behavior.
Sad...
For cripes sake it is just a freaking update registration to discuss bugs before its released, and you're turning this into some sort of Bible class on morality.
Look, if this was a family member saying in an email, I have cancer but dont tell anyone else, I wouldn't say it. That's 10000000000 times more important than, what is in the grand scheme of things, a piddly email on a piddly software update for something your generation (I'm guessing) didn't even remotely have at one point. If I'm disqualified from the "test", oh noes. My life isn't going to end. This isn't federal government secrets here.
If I didn't make this post, someone else does. If they are that concerned about secrecy, then selecting members of the public to test it is not the way to go. They, among anyone else, should know the news would get out there anyway. Why start to make it essentially public if you want it sooooo confidential?
So instead of reading the email and acting in your post on your moral high horse like we are all going to Federal prison for life, just take the damn news and be happy an update is soon. I swear, responses like yours are more of a buzz kill than Buzz Killington.