Galaxy S5: Huge disappointment, Samsung TOTALLY dropped the ball!

A lot of people prefer on-screen buttons. I disabled all of the hardware buttons on my S4 and am using a nav bar :D


Sent via Tapatalk
I prefer my home/back/menu buttons UNDER the screen not ON the screen. This is why I didn't get the G2. That permanently takes away screen real estate, a real no-no in my book. So the G2's 5.2" screen really becomes more like 4.9". The physical home button is just awful beyond words. I don't want to have to physically exert pressure to hit it. I just want to be able to tap it lightly with my fingertip and have it respond. I hate it on iphones and I hate it on GS phones.
 
Last edited:
Re: Huge disappointment, Samsung TOTALLY dropped the ball!

This.

I really don't get why this is so hard for people to understand. It's constantly parroted around here that SD support is some sort of silver bullet for all storage woes and that other manufacturers are evil for excluding it. As if there weren't reason they did so. Manufacturers do things for a reason. As I'll say again, there is a tangible disadvantage BOTH for the manufacturer and consumer in including an SD card slot. It is a security loophole. It is prone to corruption as well as losing all your data (both by losing the card and it becoming corrupted). It is inherently less reliable and slower than internal storage. Search any Galaxy forum about errors relating to the SD card and you'll see that it is a customer-service nightmare for the manufacturer as well. Lastly, one thing which I have NOT seen mentioned anywhere else, is that Samsung is now adhering to Google's new SD card permissions in Android 4.4. Pretty much nerfing their utility overall. The article below has more info.

Samsung Galaxy S4, Note 3 Android 4.4 Problem hits Micro SD Card

Could any manufacturer like getting rid of them to make things simpler, cheaper and not wasting internal space, as opposed to anything resembling real "security" issues?

I go back a long, long, long way with SD cards in smartphones. I still note: 0 problems here. The advantages are simply endless, however. This isn't about getting some cool thing I never use. It is about getting something I use every day and that is central to my computing life. I'm still waiting for the first issue to occur, but the bottom line truth is that storage space is GROSSLY inadequate for me as things now stand without a SD card slot. So, I don't really consider it optional, but a necessity in terms of how I use my phone and enjoy it as an entertainment device. That's not a "rallying cry" as someone else said, but just practicality.

I could be wrong but a part of me wonders if the SD card / removable battery is a rallying call some fans use as a trump for their support of Samsung

Yes, I'd say you're wrong. I'm not the fanboy type. I wouldn't look at Apple because they lacked those features, no matter what I thought of Apple and how I yearned for the greatest and latest. I had an HTC. I dumped HTC when I upgraded because they moved to "no card, no removable battery" as a model.My first inclination was to get another HTC. They didn't have what I wanted. Buh-bye. Hello, Samsung. BTW, in terms of manufacturers knowing what they are doing, I hear HTC is now coming out with models with SD card slots. Hmmm.

This is the simple bottom line: I buy Samsung because it does what I want in those regards and meets my trilogy of most important demands for making my phone useable to me: screen size, SD card and removable battery, in that order. Plus, it has amazing specs always--it's well worth buying even so. So, there is not much downside. I'm less concerned with bells and whistles, but they are nice to have.

It is just a practical useability question with the card. I cannot function as well without it. Same with the battery issue--and I think I gave an excellent and real world example of how useful that can be. Why is that so unimportant and just a "rallying cry?" It was a lifesaver on my last vacation when the phone kept draining because I was using it as a GPS and MP3 player, but that wasn't a worry for ME. It has been critically important many times. You know, when you're popping around a city you can't always take out an external battery pack and sit there for 2 hours waiting for it to charge, and you don't always have time to sit in a coffee shop begging for an outlet. Maybe such things don't impact you as much. I travel a lot. It is a necessity for me. A spare battery is amazingly easy to have in the pocket. Light, cheap, quick change. (And you don't have to send the device back to the mfg. when the battery starts to lose capacity to hold charges, either. You spend $10 and buy a new one. If you don't have a removable battery, moreover, you are more likely to be draining the only battery you have constantly--thus, making it more likely that the fixed battery will have a short life span--a double whammy.)

If SD card slots have problems, so do phones in general. The goal should be to make them better, not eliminate the slots, given how useful they are. And still--no problems here.

To me, these are just simple, functional issues that make it possible for me to use my phone as I want to and need to, not theory or fanboy cults.
 
Last edited:
I think we're asking if people feel the need for yesterday's solutions because today's other options are inadequate or if they don't see any other way to interact with the device or any other solutions in the future. I'm not suggesting a, " you're holding it wrong" argument, but reemphasizing the tradeoff in the lack of pressure for manufacturers to speedily innovate better solutions so long as people continue to not only buy, but vehemently defend and even create religiosity around the old ways. This feels like floppy disks and VHS from one side.

XT1060. Through spacetime.
 
Th S5 was launch and the crowd of 5000+ was'nt very impressed! We will have to wait for what the competitors has to offer to decide. It is really a pity Samsung that you did not sell us S5 without any doubts. This launch should have been bang and WOW that cause all potential buyers to just forget about any other competitors and just go get the S5. But at last, this is not the case in this bad launch. If they think they have a premium S5 set under wraps, that would be a very bad and unwise marketing strategy as the whole world was waiting so eagerly for this S5 and it drop like a "Oh well just another high end phone, nothing really special". Have'nt they read of the saying strike while it is hot!!!. If the Ram was 3G and battery was 3200mah, I would go for it even if it is not so nice in design. But then, there are no redeeming factors on S5. What main features
available on S5, they are on the other similar competitors handsets (LG Pro G2, Xperia Z2, HTC M8). This is a sad story for S5 launch.

Note: Heart beat and finger scanner is just gimmicks. I do not have top secret info to hide and what makes you think your phone can be protected by the finger scanner when any app can easily access your contacts or browser history or SDcard if permission is granted. No smart phone is completely secured. The finger scanner is just a sales gimmick! Do not let this be a purchase factor. Screen size, Battery capacity, System memory and less bloat ware is what counts.
 
I prefer my home/back/menu buttons UNDER the screen not ON the screen. This is why I didn't get the G2. That permanently takes away screen real estate, a real no-no in my book. So the G2's 5.2" screen really becomes more like 4.9". The physical home button is just awful beyond words. I don't want to have to physically exert pressure to hit it. I just want to be able to tap it lightly with my fingertip and have it respond. I hate it on iphones and I hate it on GS phones.

It's not permanent. They go away for videos and gaming or reading. You can also set the nav bar height to make it smaller, at least when you're rooted.

Sent from my Galaxy S4 running SlimKat 4.4.2
 
Aside from those 3 he mentioned which as he said, disappear when needed, I can't see why on screen buttons are an issue
 
Aside from those 3 he mentioned which as he said, disappear when needed, I can't see why on screen buttons are an issue

They aren't to anyone that has used an N5. Google calls it "immersive mode" and it works like a charm!
 
My biggest disappointment with this phone is the fact that Samsung thought it was smart to stick with 16gb base memory. With how big their rom is their is no reason to gimp people with 8gb of usable app storage on their phones.
 
My biggest disappointment with this phone is the fact that Samsung thought it was smart to stick with 16gb base memory. With how big their rom is their is no reason to gimp people with 8gb of usable app storage on their phones.

And to think not to many years ago I was geeked that my HTC Diamond had 4gb lol

Sent from my EVO using AC Forums mobile app
 
Shoot I forget how much app storage I had on the original droid but I know it was pathetic. But come on when a stock s3 has more app storage than a stock s5 Samsung is doing something wrong.
 
I love the new features they added, they are actually useful for once,especially that dual lte wifi thing.the design is fairly ugly,at least on the back of the display ,however a case can get rid of that issue. As for the storage,that's just flat out horrible.


Sent from my Apple iPad Air using Tapatalk

Back is removable. I'm sure there will be replacement backs too. Case may not even be needed.
 
Back is removable. I'm sure there will be replacement backs too. Case may not even be needed.

I always use a case, just for the look.

There are also metal backs that those who keep complaining about plastic can use online, however they run about 50$
 
Re: Huge disappointment, Samsung TOTALLY dropped the ball!

There are other inherent advantages to having all of the storage internal. I'd prefer internal storage, and if I do get an S5 i won't use the SD card slot at all. I'll make do with whatever is available to me on the 32gb version.

There are too many stories about corrupted cards or OS problems that can be traced to the SD card for me to be ok with that.

But, I totally understand why some people like having the SD card slot.

While I agree that there are problems with sd cards, I want a phone with 128gb or at least 96gb internal and a large screen on Verizon. Currently there are not even any Verizon phones that have over 64gb to my knowledge.

dpham00, Android Central Moderator
Sent from my Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 3 via Tapatalk Pro
 
My biggest disappointment with this phone is the fact that Samsung thought it was smart to stick with 16gb base memory. With how big their rom is their is no reason to gimp people with 8gb of usable app storage on their phones.

Exactly what I said but was told "regular" folks are fine with the 16gb version.
 
Exactly what I said but was told "regular" folks are fine with the 16gb version.

I think a lot of old people,no offense to anyone,don't really care because they don't download a lot of apps.

Whereas power users,like me,need the storage for apps games,podcasts,etc


Sent from my Apple iPad Air using Tapatalk
 
I have an S4 and that is the max that I think is comfortable to use...I just think the S5 is approaching the "too big" barrier. I was hoping the S5 was going to have a much tinier bezel than the S4 so the overall size was the same or smaller than the S4. It's still a killer phone for those upgrading from an S3 though.
 
Samsung Galaxy S5 was designated for Psychiatric hospital in Korea

Samsung-Heart-rate-sensor-medical-equipment-Korea.jpg


source

who is going to buy this phone in the us and Europe? hospitals? LMAO @ SAMSUNG
 

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
957,275
Messages
6,972,178
Members
3,163,751
Latest member
CassiveMock