Was huge for me especially gps in s3 way better than s2,battery life Omg way better, screen much better to me. Games super fliud, the phone way faster, camera way better, overall look better to me, I love wifi direct when me and friends in a party snapping pics... S3 big upgrade
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Android Central Forums
The fact that the GPS was buggy or you got bad battery life doesn't make it any more of an upgrade (Sprint being pretty bad at updates, I feel for you). The S2 had AGPS and if you weren't on Sprint you'd have gotten great battery life - in fact the S2 was raved about all over the interwebs for its great battery life, was it not? In fact, the Sprint variant was one of the top performers. My Skyrocket's GPS is flawless and it's running a stock 4.0.4 ROM. The only difference between my phone and the S3:
S3 Camera is somewhat better
S3 has updated TouchWiz/Software
S3 has higher Screen Resolution/Bigger Screen
S3 updated the SoC (doh)
S3 has more RAM (not that it's needed)
Apple did all of that with the iPhone 5 (well the updated RAM is a US thing for the GS3). It's basically what all the manufacturers do. They make modest improvements and market it as the best thing ever, and make it look like it's such a huge upgrade. Samsung's flagship only looked like a huge leap because they used such a low res panel on the GS2.
WiFi Direct are you serious? The 1st Gen Galaxy S was the first WiFi-Direct certified smartphone. You're a bit late in mentioning that one.
The S3 was no huge upgrade. It was quite a modest upgrade, just well-marketed. Samsung is just the Apple of the Android ecosystem.
- - - Updated - - -
Sniff sniff do I smell an apple whore lol. I found solo many faults in this I can't even comment on them all but I can say this NFC is still taking off well here in Chicago at least two new stores started accepting NFC lol appleheads BTW the sgs3 is one of the best phones out today goofball stop hating
Sent from my Nexus S 4g rocking Jellybean using Tapatalk 2
I don't own any Apple products. I owned an iTouch, which I sold after 4-5 months of owning it. However, I have owned 6 Android devices, 2 Blackberries, 1 Windows Phone, and a Windows Mobile device (HD2) within the last 2 years.
iPhone? Never owned one.
NFC is near useless here because Google has tied down Wallet to one carrier and the general consumer is not going to hack their phone to get it on there. AT&T etc. have locked down the Secure Element in their branded devices until they are ready to deploy Isis. Passbook will probably be supported at a far higher rate than Wallet, and due to the nature of its implementation it will likely prove to be more useful as well.
Watch your mouth.
- - - Updated - - -
Funny how u say this is a carbon copy of iOS. So Samsung must have a time machine to go to the future and copy iOS 6. Most of the ios6 feature have been in android for years. Who is copying who.
Only reason they will sell a ton is cause apple has all the isheep brainwashed.
Retina isn't a technology just something apple throws out to make it sound special. And I wouldn't want to use it on such a small screen.
And iOS is so limited . Android is much more open and customizable. Also funny how apple was saying only the iPhone can talk and surf the web at the same time. When android already could. And iPhone 5 won't have that. And will prob have it on the iPhone 5s and say they invented it and its the best thing.
Apple copies more and gets away with it. Must be paying some off. Weird how apple wins all the cases in the us(always the same judge, something fishy there). But looses most of the cases in other countries.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Android Central Forums
I said some features are carbon copies of iOS features, and gave SVoice as an example. Did you even read my post, are does anger cloud your judgement THAT much? I thought it was common knowledge that Samsung went out of their way to copy Apple. I mean, I own a Samsung Galaxy device myself, but that doesn't mean blind favortism was part of my contract...
---
EDIT: To the person upthread (no one actually answers questions just argues it seems):
WiFi Direct works similar to BT, except it's a ton faster and has a longer [usable] range. You basically connect (pair) two WiFi direct devices together similar to the way you would if you were doing a BT File Transfer and transfer files over the faster connection. It's generally almost always faster than BT since there are still a lot of older devices out there and even devices with WiFi-Direct may only have BT 2.1+EDR in lieu of BT 3 or 4 + HS (or they may have BT 3 but not have the HS Profile).
SBeam works by pairing over NFC and making transfers over WiFi Direct.
You cannot use WiFi direct if you are connected to a WiFi hotspot (similar to WiFi tethering).