trucksmoveamerica#AC
Trusted Member
- Jul 20, 2010
- 8,463
- 1,106
- 113
I agree three seconds would be slow, but I haven't found the delay to be over a second with either the S10+ or Note10+. Granted that capacitive still has the edge if speed means much but so far the ultrasonic hasn't changed my life. Rear capacitive FPS was fine but some like it up front so it's the devil we're dealing with for now.
I remember when they put the FPS on the back, there was complaint after complaint about the location, now it is the best place for it. Examples, It's hard to reach, it doesn't read my print unless I have it completely on the reader which is hard to reach....I personally like it where it's at now, under the screen. Drawbacks, it does not work with dirty hands, not talking just muddy hands. If the screen is dirty, Dusty it will give some issues. You have to register your fingerprints exactly right, and yes it's a second, if that, longer to read your fingerprints, if that's an issue then maybe people need to slow down in life or use a different unlock method which probably won't be any quicker.
Samsung is at least trying this out, they use feedback and improve with updates and future phone releases. Yes, it's a thousand plus phone, but I surely hope nobody upgraded to the note 10 for the FPS, it's a feature that works for most. Everyone I've seen in my personal life that got the s10 or note 10, first thing I ask them is how is the FPS working, and they all say great. The reviews for the s10 were all out there on the FPS, nobody should have thought there was any difference on the note 10.