DISCLAIMER: The contents of this post is solely the personal thoughts and initial impressions of the writer, and do not reflect the overall views of the moderator team, the AC Forums Trusted Members team and Android Central/Mobile Nations as a whole.
So, Andy Rubin's new company, Essential, recently unveiled their smartphone, the Essential PH-1, and its response was......rather mixed. Tech outlets seem to like what it is while others don't seem to think so.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of it, for reasons which may seem obvious if you've followed me throughout the Android Central comments for the past few hours, but also another reason why I haven't made clear.
Now, there are some reasons why I like this phone, but first, I need to make it clear why I'm not big on it.
The first reason is actually quite obvious; The display, or rather, a weird oddity that actually sticks out.You've probably heard it over and over again, which is probably because that's the first thing that comes out at you. Perhaps in the pursuit of a bezel-less design, someone thought to have a cut-out in the display so that it looks as if it's going around the front camera. Honestly, I think that's silly. I don't see the practical benefit of a design like this and I have a bad feeling that once you keep looking at it, it's very hard to unsee it, especially at night, where the display looks as if it lost a tooth.
The Essential PH-1 also lacks some stuff which may or may not ruffle some feathers, although some may argue that for a $700 phone, there's no excuse to why it isn't there. These include;
Depending on which side of the fence you're on, you either find those a real bummer or a minor annoyance, but for the former, it's somewhat ironic that a phone created by a company called "Essential" is missing a few features which may be considered essential for a premium flagship.
Of course, it's not all bad. Andy's phone actually has a number of high points, some of which include;
So what does this all mean? Do I hate the PH-1? Absolutely not. These are just my initial impressions and reactions ("Eugh, what the heck happened to that display" was pretty much mine at first glance, by the way) on the PH-1. Overall, I'm rather mixed on Andy's new baby as of right now. It has a lot of high points but also mixes those highs with some weird design oddities and decisions along with some unknowns which should be answered as the device nears consumer release. I hope the device does find some success in the enthusiast world so that perhaps Andy and his team can get feedback from those people and perhaps implement them in the PH-2.
So, Andy Rubin's new company, Essential, recently unveiled their smartphone, the Essential PH-1, and its response was......rather mixed. Tech outlets seem to like what it is while others don't seem to think so.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of it, for reasons which may seem obvious if you've followed me throughout the Android Central comments for the past few hours, but also another reason why I haven't made clear.
Now, there are some reasons why I like this phone, but first, I need to make it clear why I'm not big on it.
The first reason is actually quite obvious; The display, or rather, a weird oddity that actually sticks out.You've probably heard it over and over again, which is probably because that's the first thing that comes out at you. Perhaps in the pursuit of a bezel-less design, someone thought to have a cut-out in the display so that it looks as if it's going around the front camera. Honestly, I think that's silly. I don't see the practical benefit of a design like this and I have a bad feeling that once you keep looking at it, it's very hard to unsee it, especially at night, where the display looks as if it lost a tooth.
The Essential PH-1 also lacks some stuff which may or may not ruffle some feathers, although some may argue that for a $700 phone, there's no excuse to why it isn't there. These include;
- Lack of rated water and dust-resistance. The phone may have some degree of resistance to both, but it has not been rated.
- Lack of a dedicated 3.5mm headphone jack, although the phone ships with an included adapter.
Depending on which side of the fence you're on, you either find those a real bummer or a minor annoyance, but for the former, it's somewhat ironic that a phone created by a company called "Essential" is missing a few features which may be considered essential for a premium flagship.
Of course, it's not all bad. Andy's phone actually has a number of high points, some of which include;
- A ceramic back with a titanium frame should make for a phone that's hard to scratch and also one that is more resilient to drops, provided that it's dropped on its corner.
- The dual camera array is pretty nifty, utilizing what Huawei does on the P10 and Mate 9, featuring a primary RGB sensor complemented by a secondary monochrome-only sensor without a Bayer RGB filter, resulting in increased sensitivity to light as well as lower noise and better dynamic range.
- The modular design seems pretty nifty for small accessories like the 360-degree camera along with other accessories.
- That 360-degree camera also looks nifty, being small enough to snap onto the phone's back while also giving the full perspective of a 360-degree cam.
- The Ocean Depths color actually looks slick
- It packs the usual high-end internals you'd expect from a premier device
- It runs a build of Android that's probably one of the closest to what Google ships on the Nexus/Pixel.
So what does this all mean? Do I hate the PH-1? Absolutely not. These are just my initial impressions and reactions ("Eugh, what the heck happened to that display" was pretty much mine at first glance, by the way) on the PH-1. Overall, I'm rather mixed on Andy's new baby as of right now. It has a lot of high points but also mixes those highs with some weird design oddities and decisions along with some unknowns which should be answered as the device nears consumer release. I hope the device does find some success in the enthusiast world so that perhaps Andy and his team can get feedback from those people and perhaps implement them in the PH-2.