Charles Lambton
Well-known member
- Mar 8, 2013
- 143
- 0
- 0
It's all in the marketing. I've seen one add for the One on TV so far and I believe that was just an inclusion in a carriers normal add here in Canada. If HTC flooded the airwaves and internet with adds the same way Samsung does people would truly see that HTC makes superior devices. The average consumer isn't going to be on sites like android central and many won't even bother checking for reviews. I hear it from customers all the time about how Samsung makes great hardware and is taking market share away from Apple, it's all image though. I show the One and reviews of it to people and most of the time their jaws drop and they are amazed by the difference in quality. I helped a customer with an S3 the other day and it felt like holding a damn toy in my hand, that is not how a flagship phone should feel.
The emphasis should be on Specifications, Build Quality, Software, Extra features in that order. Samsung seems to have a tie between Software and specifications and only add in extra features in terms of software. Build quality is taking a back seat for them so they can offer removable batteries and micro sd expansion. Now why can't they build an aluminum body phone that has a removal back, it doesn't have to be unibody to be high quality. Another case of quantity over quality.
The emphasis should be on Specifications, Build Quality, Software, Extra features in that order. Samsung seems to have a tie between Software and specifications and only add in extra features in terms of software. Build quality is taking a back seat for them so they can offer removable batteries and micro sd expansion. Now why can't they build an aluminum body phone that has a removal back, it doesn't have to be unibody to be high quality. Another case of quantity over quality.