This is ridiculous Verizon!
- Thread starter INK
- Start date
Those 40Mbps+ speedtests were not just a fluke.
I went to Wendy's to grab some dinner and did 5 speed tests in a row. I was about 300 yards from a tower as it was in my direct line of sight while I was in the drive thru.
My results...
Now like I said, I was less than 1000 feet from this tower, so that's why my speeds were ridiculous.
I went to Wendy's to grab some dinner and did 5 speed tests in a row. I was about 300 yards from a tower as it was in my direct line of sight while I was in the drive thru.
My results...
Now like I said, I was less than 1000 feet from this tower, so that's why my speeds were ridiculous.
You got it wrong, it seems like Galaxy S 2 will be at Verizon, not T mobile for now.
Samsung Galaxy S II US carrier names revealed: AT&T Attain, Verizon Function, and Sprint Within -- Engadget
Samsung Galaxy S II US carrier names revealed: AT&T Attain, Verizon Function, and Sprint Within -- Engadget
YourMobileGuru
Formerly VZWRocks
- Feb 25, 2010
- 2,611
- 239
- 0
My final post is this thread to say that I'm so sick of the phrase "bleeding edge." Put it in the junk pile with epic, fail and oh no you didn't please.
That's the definition of trolling.And hey say whatever you want about INK. But his posts always draw a amazing amount of post in no time.Yes I toot my own horn.
What about the Droid X2? None of the phones that you listed, barring the EVO 3D, are bleeding edge tech. They all have 3G radios and have terrible network speeds. Seeing as dual-core chips won't be fully utilized until Ice Cream Sandwich, LTE phones are the bleeding edge right now.
I don't know, I personally want to know what Chrisy thinks of the phrase EPIC FAIL. She said she doesn't like epic or fail, but what about the two of them together.
really
i lol'ed on this one so hard that all the other ones are too except for the evo 3d the other phones bring nothing new to the table and are not "bleeding edge" based on the quote you yourself provided i mean its ok to complain but common dude have some solid facts about what you're complaining about, and idk what you do with your phone that at this time, you really need and must have a dual core or else you would die, but to me its not really that important as the network it run on..
fyi hspa+ is not 4g at lest not in terms of lte so again none of those phones are bleeding edge
i lol'ed on this one so hard that all the other ones are too except for the evo 3d the other phones bring nothing new to the table and are not "bleeding edge" based on the quote you yourself provided i mean its ok to complain but common dude have some solid facts about what you're complaining about, and idk what you do with your phone that at this time, you really need and must have a dual core or else you would die, but to me its not really that important as the network it run on..
fyi hspa+ is not 4g at lest not in terms of lte so again none of those phones are bleeding edge
No sir. This leads me to my next question when do you think Verizon will get a Nexus device or AOSP Device either one?
It's not a generational step up from HSPA. It's basically a software update. LTE and WiMAX are distinctly different from EVDO and HSPA. They're new technologies. AT&T and T-Mobile have bastardized 4G branding by labeling something that isn't 4G as being 4G. Network speeds on HSPA+ are not dramatically different either. Maximum bandwidth is not a valid indicator of network performance or something that naming should be based off of.
Coming this fall: AT&T 5G LTE!
Technically you can't say what is 4g and not, remember LTE is new and HSPA+ is old
G2x: T-Mobile. Verizon: Droid X-2 is the closest to it, which is not quite as good in some regards. I bet more people end up buying the D X-2 simply because of the namesake.
Galaxy S2: T-Mobile/AT&T... Oh, that would actually be AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon last I heard. Look up the Samsung Function for Verizon.
EVO 3D: Sprint. Gimmick. 3D is nice but has no real application behind it *yet*. Once it does, then, yes, it will be a killer phone. Sense in 3D is awesome to think about. The 1080p video recording on 2D is incredible, however.
Infuse 4G: AT&T. Not even a real 4G phone. HSPA+ has fast data speeds, but is ultimately 3.5G at best. Enjoy the semi-fast speeds and all the dropped calls.
Now the Sensation I have a hearty respect for, however a lot of Sense 3.0 is gimmicks. The lock screen is mainly what I'd want in Sense 3.0. Aside, yes, it has a unibody, dual-core processor, and a qHD screen. It does one-up the Thunderbolt in all those areas, but lacks LTE. Thats Sensation 3; Thunderbolt 1.
So really, this post was largely infused with subjection. If you claim to want to be a journalist, try doing a bit more of playing Devil's Advocate for BOTH sides. Otherwise, you just make yourself look bad.
I mean, I work for Verizon and I do a better job at looking at Verizon versus other carriers' devices with an objective eye. Verizon is remaining competitive. Yes, there are better handsets on other carriers for certain things. The Nexus line is the only thing no other carrier will have an answer for except whom Google releases it with, and that is because they always have the newest version of Android.
The iPhone 5 will be completely identical for AT&T and Verizon on every function. They are literally the exact same phone.
Similar threads
Trending Posts
-
-
Question Is an absolute no ads system-wide possible (on android)?
- Started by oswalt
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram