I can’t believe how many people bought into the nonsense that this screen is flawed.
I thought it was nonsense too until I purchased a Pixel 2 XL 2 days ago. I have a Note 8, and love it, but wanted the battery life and more importantly the security updates. I also tried out the V30 for several weeks. I didn't think it's screen was bad, and assumed the XL 2's would be the same.
It isn't. It's way worse. Yes, I'm saying that in my case, the screen on my Pixel 2 XL is worse than the screen in my V30. It doesn't make sense, but it is true. The difference between the Note 8 and V30 wasn't that big, and I even posted about the V30 in that forum, saying as much. But I'm really struggling to get used to the screen of the XL 2. It's not the blue shift. Yes, that's there, but it doesn't impact me. Maybe it's that I'm used to he vibrant colors of Samsung, and even with the new "vibrant" color setting, the Pixel's screen is so flat, even compared to he regular Pixel 2, that it just looks bland and almost all colors look washed out. Compare it to a gen 1 Pixel XL, and it looks completely washed out too.
Maybe i got a bad unit. But if not, the negative hype is very real.unfortunately. I don't think Google would, or even should replace the screen. I do think they should offer more degrees of vibrant color, or more color gamut options. But I've been able to compare the XL 2 to a V30 and a Note 8, and if I ranked them out of 10, I'd give the Note a 10 (remember, it allows you to turn off the vibrant colors if you want), the V30 an 8, and the XL 2 a 4.