While i can't argue with the idea that a 128gb S6 or Note 5 with its faster memory controller will out perform a Note 4 with a 64gb card (obviously the hardware is newer and faster but I'm talking memory performance in general), I take issue with the drawing of conclusions as to the degree of performance hit made by the article given the methods used in the study. Read page 4 of the study and pay particular attention to the reference to the 3rd and 2nd to the last paragraphs. How many users are going to repartition their phones to force system cache and all application data to live on the slower microSD card? None, because cache needs to run on the fastest memory possible. Again I have no issues with the concept that internal memory is faster but the article and study is misleading. ..
I agree... And a step further... IMHO, it's truly not the SD card that should be at issue, it's the underlying code (read that as android) and thus Google, that's the real issue. Our devices are handheld computers that happen to have a phone, and are as least as powerful as notebooks of a few years ago. Whether you look at a PC, Mac, or even a Linux device - all handle external storage with vigor. Code and firmware is the real culprit in this discussion... And the apathy of those that align themselves with manufacturer and developer excuses.
Posted via the Android Central App