Wait a second....
He starts out saying he has had NO issues with the WSD he applied to his phone; says others have but he hasn't, but then says this AMFILM gives him better fingerprint performance. How can you have better fingerprint performance of the AMFilm over the WSD if you have had NO FINGERPRINT PERFORMANCE ISSUES WITH THE WSD? That makes no sense.
I watched his video of the WSD application and he raved about that. And then he produced another video about some of the complaints he has had from other people but then showing how the WSD works perfectly for him.
[video]https://youtube.com/shorts/WJRxfhxy37k?feature=share[/url]
Granted people make way too many videos just to make videos just to make money and I sure don't blame them for doing that. However, I don't see how the AM film is any better than the WSD by watching his videos. Or from reading reviews of both protectors.
One thing bugs me about the AMF is that it appears they do not use any covers for the side buttons or the top speaker grill area. That would worry me if that glue got into the top speaker grill opening and hardened; as well if any dripped down the sides, top and bottom.
The full size UV vs the smaller? Really, not a big matter. I would guess the installation time, other than the curing by the UV lights is about the same for both.
I just received my second S22U I have a WSD on order, if it does not work, I'll give AMF a try but this guy does not make any sense, unless they are sponsoring him. And I'll still give the WSD the first try.