All too big.
My S4 is optimal.
I'll compromise.
it can't be any taller than the HTC M8 but can't be wider than my S4. (146x69.8)
It can be as wide as a Galaxy S5 but not taller than my S4. (136.6x72.5)
But once again the S4 got it right.
The LG G3, the Sony Z2 and others are just too biiiig...
As I revisit this I currently feel that my Note 3 is the perfect size to me but I really enjoyed the size of the Lumia 1520 too.
While something the size if the note is perfect for some, there are plenty out there that would like something under 5", it would be nice if a high end device under 5" was offered.
Because according to their marketing research, people prefer bigger phones. Motorola said when they surveyed, something like 70% were going to upgrade to a bigger screen. So if you sell a flagship phone that is smaller, you're going to sell less phones. Because you're going to sell less phones, components cost more because you are buying less of them, so you need to charge more. So for a similarly specced device, you're going to pay more for a smaller device, which means they'll sell even less. No win position for them.I wonder why oems are not addressing the desire by some for a <=5" flagship.
Because according to their marketing research, people prefer bigger phones. Motorola said when they surveyed, something like 70% were going to upgrade to a bigger screen. So if you sell a flagship phone that is smaller, you're going to sell less phones. Because you're going to sell less phones, components cost more because you are buying less of them, so you need to charge more. So for a similarly specced device, you're going to pay more for a smaller device, which means they'll sell even less. No win position for them.
Yes phones are getting too big, and its a shame that all flagship phones are now phablets :/
Some believe that market research has driven OEMs into that position, with relatively few still want <=4.5" flagships. I prefer phones in the 5-6.3" range but I know not everyone does. What is wrong with smaller devices that are not flagships? For me, the less than 2GB of RAM and <1080p resolution is my only gripe. I prefer a good amount of screen real estate.
Sent from my LG G-PaD??????
Some believe that market research has driven OEMs into that position, with relatively few still want <=4.5" flagships. I prefer phones in the 5-6.3" range but I know not everyone does. What is wrong with smaller devices that are not flagships? For me, the less than 2GB of RAM and <1080p resolution is my only gripe. I prefer a good amount of screen real estate.
Sent from my LG G-PaD![]()
Thanks for proving my point. People on smartphone forums always want bigger and better phones with bells and whistles galore. Regular folks want a device with a 4-4.5 inch screen that they can use for texting/calling/emailing and occasionally browsing the web. For everything else they use a tablet or a laptop or even a PC.
It's things like LG's current lineup: G3 at 5.5", QHD, and then G3 Beat/s/Vigor, 5.0", 720p. Seems like there ought to be a 1080p phone in there somewhere, no?Some believe that market research has driven OEMs into that position, with relatively few still want <=4.5" flagships. I prefer phones in the 5-6.3" range but I know not everyone does. What is wrong with smaller devices that are not flagships? For me, the less than 2GB of RAM and <1080p resolution is my only gripe. I prefer a good amount of screen real estate.
Sent from my LG G-PaD![]()
It's things like LG's current lineup: G3 at 5.5", QHD, and then G3 Beat/s/Vigor, 5.0", 720p. Seems like there ought to be a 1080p phone in there somewhere, no?
Yeah, I really prefer the software and hardware design on the newer LG models though. They could still update the UI on the G2, and then it would match up well against e.g. Moto X 2014.