mookiekillsit
Well-known member
- Aug 30, 2012
- 889
- 3
- 18
Can't agree with Pixel being the top based on their current "Best Android Phone" article.
For a "best" you have to include all aspects.
Specs
Features
Camera
Battery life
Price
Design
UI
For the price Samsung s7/edge must surely win? And I don't own one btw.
The price of the Pixel, is absurd considering the features missing, or waterproofing, no SD support, untested battery life, copycat design.
The only major feature(s) are the UI, and maybe the camera.
Then you have the oneplus 3. Which is effectively the Pixel without nougat. But more than half the price.
I really feel ACs reviews and recommendations for the Pixel are somewhat forced by their business model and advertising needs.
If this was an independent site (not android specific) then the Pixel would not be top.
If Sammy made a phone w/o TouchWiz, it might be the best ever.
Nonsense. From what we know the s7 has much better battery life. Performance looks to be the same, at least the exynos version. The camera is debatable and it seems to be an even split in terms of preference (I'd say most people seem to prefer the s7 but that may be bias). The display on the s7 is better too. Updates are better on google devices but not by much, and not enough to actually make much difference in reality. The s7 was also the first device to properly support vulkan (but maybe beta nougat devices had it too?).Performance, buttery smooth, regular updates, great camera, great battery, great display. Main thing doesn't stutter for a $800 device something which every flagship galaxy phone does.
May be you are just in denial to see the truth. Agree everyone has different needs but if you want a phone with great user experience, updates Pixel is the one to go without any of the carrier crap and Samsung keeps bending over back to the carriers to let them spoil the phone. Samsung doesn't care about user experience, all they care is satisfying carriers since they are their customers and they will let them do whatever they want to the phone. Again that may be fine to millions of users but definitely not for me.Nonsense. From what we know the s7 has much better battery life. Performance looks to be the same, at least the exynos version. The camera is debatable and it seems to be an even split in terms of preference (I'd say most people seem to prefer the s7 but that may be bias). The display on the s7 is better too. Updates are better on google devices but not by much, and not enough to actually make much difference in reality. The s7 was also the first device to properly support vulkan (but maybe beta nougat devices had it too?).
There are too many areas the s7 is better for AC to say the pixel is better, not even equal, and not even validate it.
Well saidIt is a consistency in people arguing against the Pixels being compared favorably or even in the same realm of other established leaders like iPhone and S7/edge that they focus on specific features that Pixels lack while choosing to not acknowledge value-adding innovations that Google has implemented that are available either nowhere else, or nowhere else among Android devices.
No SD? Unlimited free lifetime cloud storage in full resolution for photos/video. 128GB? 500GB? 10TB? All you want...
No waterproofing? Well, no phone is waterproof. If an OEM claims it is, ask them why they don't warrant vs water damage. It's varying degrees of water resistance. Pixel isn't rated as highly, true, but it's not like the argument that it recoups that difference elsewhere is invalid. Rounding the facts to the nearest whole that would better support your position undermines that position.
Dull design? I'm ok with that. A lot of people want their phone to be a status symbol or flashy. A lot don't care, and would rather the R&D costs and time invested to be put towards improving the actual experience. Take your choice.
For any phone that someone says is better and points out features it has that Pixel doesn't and says "THAT is why Pixel isn't as good/worth the money!" one can make up a counter list to the say the same about the other phone. Thing is, neither person is right in their argument for anyone other than his/herself.
Example vs S7/Edge, since that's the position you took with them over the Pixels:
The price of the S7/Edge is absurd considering the features missing... Limited bands for international use; inability to work with all major wireless network technologies; no unlimited storage; poor history of delivering timely updates to OS, rarely delivering more than 1 major release; recent history of related products with MAJOR flaw; overpriced because 'they can' due to brand recognition; slower to replace defective devices; running OS a full generation and a subsequent revision release behind; outdated AI; no on-device support; bloatware, most of which can, if desired, be available to other devices via Play; etc (I'm sure there's more, but those are a few big ones off the top of my head).
Point of the above isn't to bash Samsung. They have a lot of strengths for their side of the argument, and both are good phones. I personally really like the S7 Edge. It was a close decision between it and the Pixel. But stacking all of the pros and cons exclusive to one another, for what I'm looking for, the Pixels came out noticeably on top.
Also, if you feel AC would buckle in selection to advertising needs, let me ask you this: do you really think AC sees more capital, historically and long-term, resulting from Google or Samsung? If Samsung, a supposition with which I suspect most would agree, then that would speak even more highly of how they feel about the Pixels were they to slant it at all.
Last point, declaring that if AC were independent they'd have said differently is an interesting position to take given just how many independent sites have come to the same conclusion as AC regarding the Pixel.
May be you are just in denial to see the truth. Agree everyone has different needs but if you want a phone with great user experience, updates Pixel is the one to go without any of the carrier crap and Samsung keeps bending over back to the carriers to let them spoil the phone. Samsung doesn't care about user experience, all they care is satisfying carriers since they are their customers and they will let them do whatever they want to the phone. Again that may be fine to millions of users but definitely not for me.
What are you talking? I'm not on Verizon and use the crappy carriers as dumb pipes. I bought from Google store and using on T-Mobile.That's only in the US. Where you can only get a carrier pixel through Verizon. You are clearly the one in denial when you make a generalised comment when in reality you are talking about people who stick to one carrier in one country.
Can't agree with Pixel being the top based on their current "Best Android Phone" article.
For a "best" you have to include all aspects.
Specs
Features
Camera
Battery life
Price
Design
UI
For the price Samsung s7/edge must surely win? And I don't own one btw.
The price of the Pixel, is absurd considering the features missing, or waterproofing, no SD support, untested battery life, copycat design.
The only major feature(s) are the UI, and maybe the camera.
Then you have the oneplus 3. Which is effectively the Pixel without nougat. But more than half the price.
I really feel ACs reviews and recommendations for the Pixel are somewhat forced by their business model and advertising needs.
If this was an independent site (not android specific) then the Pixel would not be top.
Nonsense. From what we know the s7 has much better battery life. Performance looks to be the same, at least the exynos version. The camera is debatable and it seems to be an even split in terms of preference (I'd say most people seem to prefer the s7 but that may be bias). The display on the s7 is better too. Updates are better on google devices but not by much, and not enough to actually make much difference in reality. The s7 was also the first device to properly support vulkan (but maybe beta nougat devices had it too?).
There are too many areas the s7 is better for AC to say the pixel is better, not even equal, and not even validate it.
What I can guarantee: any problems encountered will be fixed, pronto.
Not sure you want to be on the hook for that... it has never been in Google's nature. It is however one of the most interesting things to keep an eye on regarding these phones.
If Sammy made a phone w/o TouchWiz, it might be the best ever.
Not sure you want to be on the hook for that... it has never been in Google's nature. It is however one of the most interesting things to keep an eye on regarding these phones.
One of the things I like about forums is the fact that they are informative. IMO the OP brought up a valid point: why is the Pixel the best or among the best?. Don't get offended just cause you own a pixel and turn it into a Samsung vs Google thing. I am not a SamsungGanger. I am simple on the fence seeking information on which phone to buy between Pixel and LG V20. The point was brought up about waterproofing, true all phones are not waterproof but there are more features than water proofing. For example, the LG V20 has a Quad dac, removable battery, dual camera, expandable storage. With all this, I am still considering the Pixel. I just want to know what makes the Pixel SOOO good. In other words, Sell Me the Phone.