I can wait.
You gotta admit this is a dam good piece of hardware.![]()
Agreed.
I do hope that when Froyo is relased for the VZW Fascinate, that people will enjoy and not immedialy demand gingerbread (eventhough the Galaxy S2 is the only one that has it so far).
Has anyone else read this explanation for no froyo? Long story short Samsung is the only company that charges carriers for os updates and US carriers aren't paying.
Has anyone else read this explanation for no froyo? Long story short Samsung is the only company that charges carriers for os updates and US carriers aren't paying.
Has anyone else read this explanation for no froyo? Long story short Samsung is the only company that charges carriers for os updates and US carriers aren't paying.
The problem here is that Snopes doesn't weigh in on these stories.
Please don't consider for one minute that this could be true. Its absolutely ridiculous.
I usually go by Hanlon's Razor ("Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.") But in this case, the fact that all four US carriers have basically no confirmed date or even leaks on Froyo for the Galaxy S line points to one common denominator: Samsung. This puts me in the believer category on this one. Not that it matters to Verizon or Samsung what a bunch of dorks who *already* bought their phones think, but I wanted to share it anyway.
Except there are more than 4 US carriers, and most if not all of them have update release announcements with dates.
lol... well sprint had a release date for froyo for the epic 4g also... Dec 26th. as of today I don't believe they actually have their update
Samsung has released froyo to Verizon. It is not Samsung that is holding up the release but Verizon.
Epic. And the other carriers are holding their releases too... The ones who have had galaxy s phones on the market months longer? And verizon, for all their faults, still managed to drop froyo for the d1, d2, dx, and dinc? It just doesn't add up.